Legal Opinion

Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. Briggs

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1983No. 48731-6PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDimmick, J.

This interpleader action was brought by Millers Casualty Insurance Company of Texas (Millers) to determine the limits of its liability under an automobile insurance policy. Passengers in a car involved in a 1-car accident sought coverage under both the liability and underinsured motorist provisions of an insurance policy insuring the host vehicle. The policy, issued by Millers, excluded the insured vehicle from the definition of an underinsured vehicle. The policy provided protection to the passengers under the liability provisions only. The trial court held that the exclusion was against…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Breaux v. Government Emp. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  4. Federated American Insurance v. RaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Cammel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. Hamilton v. Farmers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. NissenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API