Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Home Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 26, 1973No. 19572PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Justice.

We held in Willis v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of N. Y., 253 S. C. 91, 169 S. E. (2d) 282, that a provision in an automobile liability policy excluding liabilty coverage to an insured while driving an automoble which is not described in the policy, but which is owned by the named insured or a member of the same household, was a valid policy provision and did not conflict with the requirements of the South Carolina Motor Vehicle Saftey Responsibility Act (Sections 46-750.31(2) and 46-750.32, Cumulative Supplement to 1962 Code of Laws). Our decision was based upon the provisions of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Eastern Fire & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. Willis Ex Rel. Willis v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cardin v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Auto Owners Insurance v. RollisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Lowery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1973

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API