Legal Opinion

Newkirk v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 1989No. 00031PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge:

The issue presented in this appeal is whether a “class one” beneficiary, 1 who was injured in a motor vehicle accident involving only the insured’s vehicle, is precluded from recovering both liability and underinsured motorist coverage under an automobile insurance policy which excludes family-owned vehicles from the definition of underinsured vehicles.

Appellant, Sandra C. Newkirk, was riding as a passenger in a car owned and operated by her husband, Charles Newkirk, when her husband lost control of the car. The car went off the roadway and struck three tree trunks.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Votedian v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Neil v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. TankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Lewis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Kelly v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Jeffrey v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Marroquin v. Mutual Benefit InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API