Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Ridenour

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1955No. Civ. 20804PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ASHBURN, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiffs Petersen sued defendant Ridenour to quiet title to a certain residence property which was owned in fee by plaintiffs on November 15, 1948. On that day they entered into a contract to sell the property to the Ridenours for a price of $10,600, payable $750 down, and $100 on January 1, 1949, and $100 on the first day of each succeeding month for 30 months and thereafter $56.85 per month “until the full balance of the F.H.A. and G.I. Loans are paid,” with interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum payable monthly for 30 months and thereafter at the rate of 4 per…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Smith v. BearCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Howard v. Bar Bell Land & Cattle Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1959
  4. MacFadden v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. County of Los Angeles v. State Department of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API