Legal Opinion
Bisno v. Sax
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 2, 1959No. Civ. 24042PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Action to enjoin trustee’s sale under trust deed and for declaratory relief. Plaintiffs Sally Bisno and Alexander Bisno appeal from the judgment.
They are the makers of a note for $34,000 dated January 9, 1951, payable in installments of $250, principal and interest, on the first of each month; the note is secured by a trust deed upon appellants' Beverly Hills home. The payee and beneficiary was Lillian Friedland who died before the foreclosure proceeding was initiated. Defendant Rose Sax was appointed special administratrix of the Friedland estate and has acted as such throughout this…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Graf v. Hope Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Nguyen v. CalhounCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Knapp v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MassingillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Shoban v. Board of Trustees of Desert Center Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.