Legal Opinion

MacFadden v. Walker

California Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1971No. Sac. 7894PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

In this case we are called upon to determine whether a vendee who would otherwise be entitled to specific performance of an installment land sale contract in which time is declared to be of the essence forfeits the right to that remedy because of her wilful failure to make installment payments when due after there has been substantial part performance of the contract. We conclude that the policy against forfeitures precludes denying the right to specific performance under such circumstances.

Sometime before 1950 defendant and cross-complainant Claudia Walker, who lived in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Baffa v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Honey v. Henry's Franchise Leasing Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. WiseHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. In Re Sapolin Paints, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1980
  3. Galdjie v. DarwishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Saika v. GoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Kudokas v. BalkusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API