Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. State Department of Public Health

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1958No. Civ. 22242, 22243PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

This is a controversy over certain tuberculosis subsidy payments claimed by the county of Los Angeles to be payable to it under the Tuberculosis Subsidy Law but withheld by the State Department of Public Health. The trial court ruled that such payments, in an aggregate amount of $330,715.69, had been improperly withheld from the county, should be paid over to it, and that future subsidies payable under the statute (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 410-414, 3099-3342) must be computed in accordance with the claim of the county. The application of the statute to partial-pay patients in county hospitals…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Estate of MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. City of Dinuba v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. v. Maxwell-JollyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Hittle v. Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In the Matter of the Estate of Van B. Hooper, Deceased. The Government of the Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  5. Benton v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API