Legal Opinion

Redemeyer v. Cunningham

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1923No. Civ. No. 2529PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action was in ejectment to recover the possession of a strip of land in the city of Ukiah, Mendocino County, described as follows: "Beginning at a point where the westerly line of Hortense Street if extended southerly would intersect the southerly line of Jones Street, and running thence southerly along the said westerly line of Hortense Street if extended southerly to the north line of Mill Street; thence easterly along the northerly line of Mill Street 24.3 feet to a certain fence; thence northerly along the line of said fence to a point in the southerly line of Jones Street; thence…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Wood v. Truckee Turnpike Co.California Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Coburn v. AmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Mills v. FletcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Glatts v. HensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Weller v. ChavarriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Saterstrom v. Glick Bros. Sash Etc. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Costa v. FawcettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Ward Redwood Co., Inc. v. FortainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API