Legal Opinion
Southern Pacific Co. v. Burr
California Supreme Court
Decided November 4, 1890No. 13339PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. •
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
— The following opinion was prepared by Belcher, C. C., when this case was pending in Department One: —
“ This is an action to recover possession of about five acres of land situate in Placer County. The case was tried before the court, without a jury, and judgment was given for defendant. The plaintiff moved for a new trial, and, the motion being denied, appealed from the judgment and order. The land in controversy is situated within and forms a part of the right of way granted to the Central Pacific Railroad Company of California by act of Congress passed July 1, 1862, entitled ‘ An act to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wood v. Truckee Turnpike Co.California Supreme Court · 1864
- City of Visalia v. JacobCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- City of Winona v. HuffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
- Wixson v. DevineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Farley v. Spring Valley Mining & Irrigating Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. GroteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Southern Pacific Co. v. HyattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Fresno Etc. Co. v. Southern Pac. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Oregon Short Line Railroad v. QuigleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
- Central Pacific Railway Co. v. DrogeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.