Legal Opinion

Saterstrom v. Glick Bros. Sash Etc. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1931No. Docket No. 4444PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, P. J.

Action to quiet title to real property. Plaintiffs prevailed in the superior court and defendant H. R. Coburn alone appeals.

Appellant contends that the evidence is. insufficient to support the finding of the trial court “that the above named plaintiffs, K. Otto Saterstrom and Anna 0. Saterstrom, are the owners of the fee simple title to the property described in paragraph 3 of plaintiffs’ complaint”, etc.

Plaintiffs relied wholly upon a record title. Their record title is based upon a sale of the property under a deed of .trust. The deed of trust is dated September 1, 1927, executed by Claud…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peck v. VandenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Scott v. WoodworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Donnelly v. TregaskisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Redemeyer v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lona v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Hanlon v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. United Truckmen, Inc. v. LorentzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Ryder v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API