Legal Opinion

Mills v. Fletcher

California Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1893No. 18150PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Nevada County. The facts are stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

Action of ejectment to recover the possession of two adjoining quartz lode mining claims, situate on the public mineral land of the United States, known as the “ Hathaway Claim” and the “Peck Claim,” each being particularly described in the complaint by metes and bounds; and also to recover three thousand dollars damages for the severance and removal from said claims of gold-bearing rock. The complaint was not verified.

By their answer the defendants deny generally each and every allegation in said complaint contained.

“Aver that the premises described in plaintiffs’ complaint are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Miller v. LucoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Wilson v. MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Meeker v. DaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Germania Building & Loan Ass'n v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. People v. DisperatiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Johnson v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Bacon v. RiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Madison v. Octave Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1908

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API