Ward Redwood Co., Inc. v. Fortain
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SPENCE, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action in ejectment.
The controversy involves the plaintiff’s claim of ownership and the right to possession of approximately 44 acres of land located in the shifting lowlands at the mouth of the Klamath River. Most of this land has been added to other land by accretion.
Plaintiff deraigns its title through a patent from the United States issued in the year 1898. It was stipulated upon the trial that the record title to the land described in said patent was in plaintiff and that said land was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re DixonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Fillmore v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Packer v. BirdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Redemeyer v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Hahn v. CurtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Schoenfeld v. PritzkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- United States v. 2,134.46 Acres of Land, More or LessDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1966
- Orloff v. MosherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944