Legal Opinion
People ex rel. Foundation for Taxpayer & Consumer Rights v. Duque
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 10, 2003No. A098863PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, P. J.
The People of the State of California, through relator the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR) filed a quo warranto action against Commissioner Henry Duque of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), contending Duque must be removed from office pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 303,1 subdivision (a), because he formerly held stock in a corporation that was regulated by the PUC. The trial court agreed and ruled Duque had forfeited his office. Duque now appeals claiming the judgment must be reversed because (1) section 303, subdivision (a), is…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Air MacHine Com SRL v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Association for Sensible Development at Northstar, Inc. v. Placer CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Pope v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Opinion No. (2004), California Attorney General Reports2004
- Opinion No. (2005), California Attorney General Reports2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.