Legal Opinion
Air MacHine Com SRL v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 2, 2010No. D054878PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, Acting P. J.
Air Machine Com SRL, an Italian limited company (COM), and Panatta Sport SRL, an Italian limited company (Panatta) (together, petitioners), seek to overturn in this writ of mandate proceeding the trial court’s ruling that they generally appeared (and thus forfeited their objection to personal jurisdiction) when they jointly served a statutory offer of settlement under Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 998 (998 offer) on real parties in interest Ponani Sukumar and Southern California Stroke Rehabilitation Associates (together, Sukumar) while their motions to quash…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walter Wencke, Theodore Delusignan, Movant-Appellant v. R.N. Gould, Receiver-TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- MacKay v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. RosasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- ViaView, Inc. v. RetzlaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Douglass v. Serenivision, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.