Pope v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
We hold in this case that a city term limit law referring to an election to a four-year term does not mean appointment or election to a less than four-year term. Defendants, Malibu City Clerk Lisa Pope and the City of Malibu (the city), seek a writ of mandate directing the respondent court to vacate a February 3, 2006 judgment and writ of mandate. The February 3, 2006 judgment and writ of mandate ordered Ms. Pope and the city to not include Councilmember Sharon Barovsky’s name on a ballot for reelection to the city council. Because the city’s term limit law…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arntz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Pope v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006