Legal Opinion
Association for Sensible Development at Northstar, Inc. v. Placer County
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 4, 2004No. C044364PublishedCited by 4 opinions
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBIE, J.
INTRODUCTION
On December 4, 2001, Placer County adopted a mitigated negative declaration for the construction of a three-building apartment complex at the Northstar Ski Resort. The developers of this project, collectively Northstar, 1 designed this complex to provide affordable housing for the employees of the ski resort and other businesses in the adjoining areas. The Association for Sensible Development at Northstar, Inc. (ASDAN), challenged the adoption of the mitigated negative declaration. The trial court set aside the adoption of the mitigated negative declaration because…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- McCormick v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- People ex rel. Foundation for Taxpayer & Consumer Rights v. DuqueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leavitt v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Cape Concord Homeowners Assn. v. City of EscondidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- TORREY HILLS COMMUNITY COALITION v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- County of Sacramento v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009