Legal Opinion
Arden v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1959No. L. A. 25269PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner seeks review of a recommendation of the Board of Governors of the State Bar that he be suspended from the practice of law for 30 days. Five of the 13 members of the Board of Governors participating in the proceedings voted against the recommendation, four on the expressed ground that the “degree of discipline recommended is too severe.”
Petitioner was admitted to the practice of the law in 1951. At the time of the occurrences here involved he had been in practice for three years, and was 28 years of age. Prior to the filing of the original notice to show cause in this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Croce v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Fall v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Petty v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Light v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Lindenbaum v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- EF Hutton & Company v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969
- E. L. Cord, Etc. v. Calvin J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. ParrishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Lewis v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.