Legal Opinion

Bradpiece v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1974No. L.A. No. 30137PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of California that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for three years.

*744Petitioner was admitted to practice in 1959. He has no prior record of discipline. In August of 1969 he was a sole practitioner.

The essential facts are not in dispute. Petitioner was retained by Katherine Berggreen to represent her and her minor son in connection with their claims for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident in September 1968. In August of 1969, the Los Angeles County…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Demain v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. In Re JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Clancy v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Hustedt v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re KreamerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API