Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BRAY, J. pro tem. *
Petitioners brought this proceeding in mandamus to compel the superior court (a) to vacate a minute order limiting the scope of a deposition, and (b) to require the State Bar and Jack A. Hayes, its secretary, to answer certain written interrogatories upon the taking of a deposition in a libel action.
Questions Presented
1. Is the desired information relevant?
2. Do the discovery statutes apply to nonparty witnesses ?
3. Do the discovery procedures apply to a corporation ?
4. (a) Are the files of the State Bar dealing with complaints concerning attorneys not resulting in public…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- People v. WestekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Greenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- People v. Tinder & SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re LifschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.