Legal Opinion

Coviello v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1955No. L. A. 23030PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

— This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Board of Governors of The State Bar that petitioner August Paul Coviello, be suspended from the practice of law in this state for a period of six months. The local committee had recommended a three months’ suspension. In making its recommendation the board took into consideration a prior suspension of 30 days ordered by this court. (Coviello v. State Bar (July 14, 1953), 41 Cal.2d 273 [259 P.2d 7].)

Petitioner was originally charged (Dec. 9, 1952) with violations of his oath and duties as an attorney and the commission of acts…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pickering v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Lantz v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Krieger v. BulpittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Coviello v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Hallinan v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Garlow v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Martin v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Baranowski v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Barreiro v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. McKinney v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API