Legal Opinion

Young v. Rosenthal

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1989No. Docket Nos. B033315, B025896, B024983, B026834 and B026937PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

In this case, involving five separate appeals, we are presented with an incredibly obscene example of the defiance, subversion and abuse of the judicial system in general and the procedures for pretrial discovery in particular. In affirming a summary judgment and two trial court sanction orders, we write what should be the final chapter of the unsuccessful efforts of a disbarred lawyer to avoid paying fees for valuable legal services rendered to him. As two of the five appeals were frivolous and were clearly motivated by an intent to delay and harass the respondent and, in…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Pierotti v. TorianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. 580 Folsom Associates v. Prometheus Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Rutledge v. Hewlett-Packard Co.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Childs v. PAINE WEBBER INCORPORATEDCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Do It Urself Moving & Storage, Inc. v. Brown, Leifer, Slatkin & BernsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API