Legal Opinion

Town of Clyde Hill v. Roisen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1989No. 54670-3PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andersen, J.—

Facts of Case

At issue in this case is whether a town's "naturally grown fence" ordinance is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the defendant's fir trees.

The plaintiff herein is the Town of Clyde Hill. In 1978, Duane Roisen, defendant herein, landscaped his Clyde Hill home with approximately 70 fir trees which were 16 to 20 feet tall. The defendant planted 13 of the trees at distances of 2 to 12 feet from the eastern boundary of his property where it abutted the property of his neighbor, Mr. Gayte. At the time the trees were planted, as well as on later occasions, this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. BergeronWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. MacIolekWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. City of Bellevue v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. AverWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Myrick v. Board of Pierce County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Lakes at Mercer Island Homeowners Ass'n v. WitrakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  5. State v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API