Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Myrick v. Board of Pierce County Commissioners

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1984No. 48297-7PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, C.J.

On November 10, 1980, the Pierce County Board of County Commissioners passed Pierce County resolution 22518, amending chapter 50.16 of the Pierce County Code. Chapter 50.16, as amended, regulates the operation of massage businesses as well as the conduct of all massagists and masseurs in the county. The stated purpose of the comprehensive amendment was to eliminate the injurious effects upon the public health, safety and welfare caused by practices associated with massage businesses and "specific hands-on bodily contact". Pierce County Code 50.16.010 (as amended November 10, 1980). The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and RegulationTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Medina v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Medina v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. AverWashington Supreme Court · 1987

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API