Legal Opinion

Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Curran

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1990No. 8630PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

The Disciplinary Board of the Washington State Bar Association (hereinafter Disciplinary Board) decided that Patrick Curran, an attorney, violated no rules of professional conduct when he was convicted of vehicular homicide. Accordingly, it terminated Mr. Curran's interim suspension, which attached automatically upon conviction of a felony, and ordered no disciplinary action. We hold that vehicular homicide reflects a disregard for the rule of law, RLD 1.1(a), and suspend him from practice for a period of 6 months beginning on the date of his oral argument before this court.

I

Until recently,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Law Students Civil Rights Research Council, Inc. v. WadmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. Melvin R. JenningsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Haley v. Medical Disciplinary BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Matter of DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API