Legal Opinion

State v. MacIolek

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1984No. 49904-7PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

This appeal presents a single issue, whether a statute and an ordinance, RCW 9.41.270 and Seattle city ordinance 110179, codified as Seattle Municipal Code 12A.14.075, are unconstitutionally vague.

Petitioners, Larry H. Maciolek and Shawn Robert Johnson, were each convicted of violating RCW 9.41.270. The statute reads:

It shall be unlawful for anyone to carry, exhibit, display or draw any firearm, dagger, sword, knife or other cutting or stabbing instrument, club, or any other weapon apparently capable of producing bodily harm, in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. City of Seattle v. EzeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. CoriaWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Haley v. Medical Disciplinary BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1991

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API