Legal Opinion

State v. Aver

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1987No. 53390-3PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodloe, J.

Defendants (petitioners) raise various challenges to their convictions under RCW 81.48.020, which makes it illegal to willfully obstruct or delay a lawfully operated train. Defendants' main challenge is that the term "lawfully operated" renders RCW 81.48.020 unconstitutionally vague. We uphold the statute and affirm their convictions.

The facts are not disputed. In Clark County District Court a jury convicted defendants of obstructing or delaying a train in violation of RCW 81.48.020. The train which defendants were convicted of obstructing is often referred to as a "White Train" or "Death…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. HalstienWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. City of Seattle v. EzeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. JoyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2001

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API