Legal Opinion

City of Spokane v. Douglass

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1990No. 56674-7PublishedCited by 281 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Harlan D. Douglass challenges the constitutionality of the City of Spokane's nuisance ordinance, Spokane Municipal Code (SMC) § 10.08.030. In a pretrial motion, Douglass moved to dismiss charges that he violated the ordinance on the theory that SMC § 10.08.030 is unconstitutionally vague. The Spokane County District Court agreed and dismissed the charges. On appeal, the Spokane County Superior Court affirmed. Our review has led us to conclude that the factual record in this case is inadequate to determine whether the municipal ordinance is unconstitutionally vague. Accordingly, the judgment…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by281 opinions

  1. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. HalstienWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008

276 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API