Matter of Personal Restraint of Young
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
In this case, the sexually violent predator provisions of the Community Protection Act of 1990 are challenged by two people who have been civilly committed under its authority. Important constitutional and technical issues are raised by this unique legislation, which seeks to protect our citizens by incapacitating and attempting to treat those whose mental abnormalities create a grave risk of future harm. Although the ultimate goal of the statute is to treat, and someday cure, those whose mental condition causes them to commit acts of sexual violence, its immediate purpose is to ensure the…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by348 opinions
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. DonohoIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Seling v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
343 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.