Legal Opinion

Herman Jackson v. Flint Ink North American Corporation, Also Known as Flint Ink Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 27, 2004No. 03-2189PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Herman Jackson filed a petition for rehearing in this case, maintaining that whether an environment is objectively hostile is always a question of fact for a properly instructed jury. We reject this argument. The question of whether an environment is sufficiently hostile to be actionable is a legal question, and, like any legal question, is a matter for the court to decide. In other words, a showing of some minimal level of harassment is necessary before a case is submissible to a jury. A court of course may decide this issue of submissibility on summary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kathy Lynn Alagna v. Smithville R-Ii School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  2. Tommy Reedy v. Quebecor Printing Eagle, Inc., and Its RepresentativesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. Herman Jackson v. Flint Ink North American Corporation, Also Known as Flint Ink CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Linda Green v. Franklin National Bank of Minneapolis, Doing Business as Franklin BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. O'BRIEN v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. Tammy Anderson v. Houston Community College System and Johnella R. Bradford, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Watson v. Ceva Logistics U.S., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. Schoonover v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API