Herman Jackson v. Flint Ink North American Corporation, Also Known as Flint Ink Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
Herman Jackson filed a petition for rehearing in this case, maintaining that whether an environment is objectively hostile is always a question of fact for a properly instructed jury. We reject this argument. The question of whether an environment is sufficiently hostile to be actionable is a legal question, and, like any legal question, is a matter for the court to decide. In other words, a showing of some minimal level of harassment is necessary before a case is submissible to a jury. A court of course may decide this issue of submissibility on summary…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kathy Lynn Alagna v. Smithville R-Ii School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Tommy Reedy v. Quebecor Printing Eagle, Inc., and Its RepresentativesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Herman Jackson v. Flint Ink North American Corporation, Also Known as Flint Ink CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
3Cited by20 opinions
- Linda Green v. Franklin National Bank of Minneapolis, Doing Business as Franklin BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- O'BRIEN v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Tammy Anderson v. Houston Community College System and Johnella R. Bradford, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Watson v. Ceva Logistics U.S., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Schoonover v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.