Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Blatt
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.
A law license authorizes an attorney to invoke the coercive powers of a court in furtherance of the interests of the attorney's client with consequences that can be devastating, even if fair, to the adverse party. Under the ethical rules governing attorneys, that authority must be exercised competently, diligently, and honestly, with adequate supervision of subordinate employees who assist the attorney, and in compliance with the attorney's fiduciary responsibilities to the client.
By the account in the record before us, Respondent Stuart R. Blatt was for many years a respected member of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PattisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MaignanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SinghCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Attorney Grievance v. RielyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Attorney Grievance v. YiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Attorney Grievance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. SilbigerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.