Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 31, 2022No. 9ag/20PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Dawn R. Jackson, Miscellaneous Docket AG No. 9, September Term, 2020, Opinion by Booth, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – This attorney grievance matter involves an attorney who is licensed in the District of Columbia and not in Maryland. The attorney is a partner in a law firm that employs Maryland attorneys. In 2014, the attorney moved the law firm’s office from the District of Columbia to Maryland. In 2015, the Office of Bar Counsel met with the attorney in her office and made specific recommendations for maintaining an office in Maryland.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HallmonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Harris-SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Attorney Grievance v. WempleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. TrezevantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Attorney Grievance v. SinghCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Attorney Grievance v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.