Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance v. Yi

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 21, 2020No. 21ag/19PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission v. John Xander Yi Misc. Docket AG No. 21, September Term 2019 Attorney Discipline – Competence, Diligence and Communication with Client – Mishandling of Client Funds – Misrepresentation to Bar Counsel – Disbarment. Disbarment is the appropriate sanction in a case in which a relatively new attorney without significant criminal law experience agreed to represent an immigrant charged with very serious drug offenses that not only could have resulted in imprisonment but also have affected her immigration status, failed to communicate adequately with the client, failed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PattisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Attorney Grievance v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Attorney Grievance v. DaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Attorney Grievance v. WescottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  5. Attorney Grievance v. IbebuchiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API