Attorney Grievance v. Riely
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Grievance Commission v. John T. Riely Misc. Docket AG No. 20, September Term 2019 Attorney Discipline – Competence, Diligence and Communication with Client – Misrepresentations – Indefinite Suspension. An indefinite suspension with a right to apply for reinstatement no sooner than one year is the appropriate sanction in a case in which an experienced immigration attorney neglected to act diligently to appear on behalf of an immigrant couple at status hearings in immigration court, failed to file a visa extension application on a timely basis on behalf of another client, and later…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Attorney Grievance v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Attorney Grievance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. TaniformCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.