Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance v. Riely

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 25, 2020No. 20ag/19PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission v. John T. Riely Misc. Docket AG No. 20, September Term 2019 Attorney Discipline – Competence, Diligence and Communication with Client – Misrepresentations – Indefinite Suspension. An indefinite suspension with a right to apply for reinstatement no sooner than one year is the appropriate sanction in a case in which an experienced immigration attorney neglected to act diligently to appear on behalf of an immigrant couple at status hearings in immigration court, failed to file a visa extension application on a timely basis on behalf of another client, and later…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Attorney Grievance v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Attorney Grievance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Attorney Grievance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Attorney Grievance v. TaniformCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API