Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Maignan

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 22, 2005No. Misc. Docket AG No. 4, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilner, J.

In a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action, Bar Counsel, acting for the Attorney Grievance Commission, charged respondent, Peter Maignan, with violating a number of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC) in the course of his representation of two clients — Hattie Lipscomb and the Magruders. The complaint regarding Ms. Lipscomb was based on Maignan’s alleged mishandling of $4,000 derived from the settlement of an action against her former landlord; the Magruder complaint involved allegations of a failure to provide a written retainer agreement and overcharging.

In accordance…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Taylor v. NationsBank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SperlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API