Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance v. Silbiger

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 26, 2022No. 57ag/20PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Clifford Baer Silbiger, Misc. Docket AG No. 57, September Term, 2020, Opinion by Booth, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – DISBARMENT Respondent Clifford Baer Silbiger violated the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 19-301.1 (Competence); 19-301.4 (Communication); 19-301.15 (Safekeeping Property); 19-308.1 (Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters); 19-308.4(a)–(d) (Misconduct); Rule 19-407 (Attorney Trust Account Record-Keeping); Rule 19-408 (Commingling of Funds); Rule 19-410 (Prohibited Transactions); and the Business Occupations…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance v. WescottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  2. Attorney Grievance v. ParrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  3. Attorney Grievance v. MaidenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. Attorney Grievance v. CulbersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  5. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. TrezevantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API