Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Estate of Brown

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 2007No. 06-PR-435Published

1DissentThompson, Associate Judge

In my opinion, the result the majority reaches today is unfair to Smith. I cannot join my colleagues in upholding the trial court’s finding that she violated Rule 1.8(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct when Glover’s siblings, who had the burden of proof in this proceeding before Judge Lopez, presented no pertinent evidence other than the fact of a business transaction between lawyer/real estate broker Smith and her client Glover; when neither the Probate Division’s procedural rules nor the court’s instructions required Smith to make an affirmative showing with respect to matters as to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. In Re VieheDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Matter of JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. In Re BaileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API