Legal Opinion
In Re Holdmann
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 6, 2003No. 00-BG-1214PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
On November 7, 2002, the Board on Professional Responsibility (BPR or Board) recommended that this court impose reciprocal discipline against Lee F. Holdmann, Esquire, a member of our Bar. Holdmann opposes the recommendation, contending that the discipline suggested by the Board — public censure — differs inappropriately from the sanction imposed by the Maryland Court of Appeals. Because Holdmann has waived any objection to the Board’s recommendation by failing to present any challenge to the Board, we follow that recommendation and publicly censure Holdmann.
I
On July…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Matter of JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Matter of ShillaireDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re FullerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re AustinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re Stephen T.YelvertonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In Re ArtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In re Laurence F. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.