Legal Opinion

In re Maxwell

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 2003No. 02-BG-716Published

1Per curiam

This matter is back before the court following our rejection of the sanction initially recommended by the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”). In In re Maxwell, 798 A.2d 525 (D.C.2002), we remanded this case to the Board, directing it to determine whether to recommend identical reciprocal discipline or to conduct further proceedings. The Board now recommends that we impose functionally identical reciprocal discipline, namely, a public censure.1

*363Neither Bar Counsel nor respondent has offered any objection to the Board’s report and recommendation. Given our limited scope of review…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re MaxwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. In Re GreenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API