Weisenberg v. Hirschhorn
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J., pro tem.
On March 10, 1925, plaintiff and respondent Weisenberg bought from defendants and appellants for $3,200 a one-third interest in a parcel of land. The contract of purchase contained a provision giving respondent “the option or privilege to have upon thirty days’ notice, within one year from the date hereof, the said sum of $3,200 refunded to him by the parties of the first part (i. e., appellants), together with interest at the rate of 7 per cent per annum to date of such refund upon surrendering and reconveying to the parties of' the first part the one-third interest in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McKee v. SoherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Sutliff v. Sweetwater Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- North Stockton Town Lot Co. v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Dean v. HawesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Amaranth Land Co. v. CoreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Still v. Plaza Marina Commercial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Ross v. McDougalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Bonner v. FinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Barnhart v. BlackburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Gray v. Fred B. Neuhoff Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932