Legal Opinion
Dean v. Hawes
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 1916No. Civ. No. 1638PublishedCited by 17 opinions
The facte are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
For the second time this case comes to this court upon appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
The action was for damages for the alleged breach of a contract to purchase real estate. Upon the first appeal the judgment was reversed because the plaintiff failed to show that she had been damaged by the alleged breach of the contract in the sum sued for or in any other sum.
The plaintiff’s cause of action rests upon allegations of fact which are substantially as follows: The defendant, in consideration of the sum of eight hundred dollars, executed to plaintiff a deed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- L. R. Junction Ry. v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- Savings Bank of San Diego v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- French v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Dean v. HawesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
- Wilkerson v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Yellen v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.