Sutliff v. Sweetwater Water Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.
This is an action to recover damages for injury done to the plaintiff’s land by the breaking, in the winter of 1916, of the Sweetwater reservoir, owned by the defendant corporation. The individual defendants are officei’s of the corporation and for simplicity we will treat the action as one against it alone, since the other defendants are certainly not liable if it is not. The cause was tried without a jury and resulted in a judgment for the defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals upon the judgment-roll.
It appears from the pleadings and findings that the reservoir in question is an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parker v. LarsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Galbreath v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Hoffman v. Tuolumne Cty. Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1858
- Moore v. San Vicente Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Everett v. Hydraulic Flume Tunnel Co.California Supreme Court · 1863
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Green v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Tormey v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Bratton v. RudnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Kall v. CarruthersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Huffmaster v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1960
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.