Legal Opinion

Amaranth Land Co. v. Corey

California Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1920No. L. A. No. 5289PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

This is an action .by an assignee of a vendor of land to compel the vendee to pay overdue installments on the purchase price and also to compel the payment of future installments by virtue of a clause in the contract of sale giving the vendor the right to declare the entire purchase price due and payable upon the vendee’s default in any of the payments. The court gave judgment for the overdue installments, but found that the right to declare the entire purchase price presently due and payable had been waived.

Defendants contend that inasmuch as the vendor retained the legal title the action is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sparks v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. McKee v. SoherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. North Stockton Town Lot Co. v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Longmaid v. CoulterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Samuel v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ross v. McDougalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Lencioni v. DanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Bonner v. FinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Burg Bros. v. BercutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. O'Gorman v. WachterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API