North Stockton Town Lot Co. v. Fischer
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This action was brought to recover the amounts agreed to be paid by defendant to plaintiff, according to the terms of a contract for the sale of certain lands. Findings were filed and judgment entered for plaintiff. This appeal is from the judgment, on the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions.
The contract was made April 5, 1895. It was therein agreed that the plaintiff would sell and defendant would buy lots 7 and 8, in block 3, in the Northern Addition to the city of Stockton, for the sum of $450, of which forty dollars was to be paid down and the balance in monthly installments…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilcoxson v. StittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Newton v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Smith v. MohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Samuel v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Allin v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Armstrong v. IrwinArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Burke v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Work v. Associated Almond GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Alexander v. WingettMontana Supreme Court · 1922
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.