Legal Opinion

Gray v. Fred B. Neuhoff Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1932No. Docket No. 4498PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, Acting P. J.

The plaintiffs in this action had judgment- for the recovery of two installments in the total sum of $35,000, being a part of the purchase price of certain real property situate in the city of Lodi, upon which there was then and there standing a canning factory, including all machinery and equipment therein and belonging thereto, save and except a few specified articles. From this judgment the defendant appeals, and upon this appeal contends : 1. That the contract price, or that the amount of the two unpaid installments did not and do not constitute the proper measure of damages; 2. That the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. J. S. Potts Drug Co. v. BenedictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Chandler v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hough v. Reserve Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Security Building & Loan Ass'n v. SeibertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API