Legal Opinion

Barnhart v. Blackburn

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1934No. Docket No. 9310PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiffs filed a complaint entitled “Complaint for Money on Contract”. It contained two counts. On a trial by the court sitting without a jury defendants’ motion for nonsuit as to the first count was granted. Judgment was entered in favor of the defendants on the first count and in favor of plaintiffs on the second count. Defendants appeal from that portion of the judgment relating to the second count, but no appeal has been taken from the portion of the judgment relating to the first count.

In the second count of the complaint, which was filed in 1929, plaintiffs allege that on May 6, 1927,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. McKee v. SoherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Sutliff v. Sweetwater Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Peek v. SteinbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gardner v. ShreveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Patrick J. Ruane, Inc. v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Martin v. ChernabaeffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Rivadell, Inc. v. RazoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Alfinito v. SaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API