Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. Rector
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a "Writ of Prohibition directed to E, N. Rector, Judge of the Superior Court of Merced County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Sullivan & Sullivan and Theo. J. Roche, and C. H. Oatman, for Petitioner. Edward P. Treadwell, Ostrander, Tuttle, Griffin & Shaffer, Brickley & Schino, Edward Briekmore, and P. W. Henderson, for Respondent.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
The Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District petitioned this court for a writ of prohibition to prevent the judge of the superior court of the state of California, in and for the county of Merced, from proceeding to hear and act upon a demurrer in a case pending in said county in which the petitioner is defendant and Miller and Lux, a corporation, is plaintiff. It appears from the affidavit of one of the attorneys for petitioner that the action in question involves the validity of a certain assessment made by petitioner, and affecting real property of said Miller and Lux in Merced County.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matter of Application of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Ruperich v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Matter of Application of MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
- In Re Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment No. 6California Supreme Court · 1923
- Daigh v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Athearn v. NicolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Hazard v. Joseph W. Bowles Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.