Legal Opinion

Matter of Application of Martin

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1909No. Crim. No. 1539PublishedCited by 27 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Constable of Angels Township, Calaveras County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Upon the application of Fred J. Martin a writ of habeas corpus was issued by this court. Martin had been arrested upon a charge of violating the terms of a statute entitled “An act regulating the hours of employment in underground mines and in smelting and reduction works” (Stats. 1909, c. 181, p. 279), approved March 10, 1909. The provisions of the act are as follows:—

“Section 1. That the period of employment for all persons who are employed or engaged in work in underground mines in search of minerals, whether base or precious, or who are engaged in such underground mines for other…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Abeel v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Ex Parte BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Matter of Application of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Magruder v. City of RedwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Matter of Yun QuongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API