Athearn v. Nicol
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for Writ of Prohibition. Writ denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
The petitioner asks for a writ of prohibition directed to the respondents, who are judges of the superior court, requiring them to desist from the contemplated . trial of certain proceedings instituted under and by virtue of an act of the legislature (Stats. 1919, p. 1092, secs. 4, 5) relating to the issuance of bonds for assessments for improvements in the Sacramento and San Joaquin drainage district. The respondents have been designated by the Governor to sit as judges of the superior court in and for the county of Sutter to hear and determine the questions that may be raised before them…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of RuefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. RectorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Austin v. HarbinTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Heidenheimer v. Cleveland & CameronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- In Re Proceeding to Validate Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment Number SixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Younger v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Andrews v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.