Legal Opinion

Tanner v. State Department of Correction

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 14, 1973No. 7310IC714PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALEY, Judge.

In reviewing a decision of the Industrial Commission in a case arising under the Tort Claims Act, an appellate court has two questions to consider: whether the Commission’s findings of fact are supported by competent evidence, and whether its conclusions of law are supported by its findings of fact. Mason v. Highway Commission, 273 N.C. 36, 159 S.E. 2d 574; Bailey v. Dept. of Mental Health, 272 N.C. 680, 159 S.E. 2d 28.

The Commission’s findings of fact are conclusive if there is any competent evidence supporting them, even though there may also be evidence that would justify a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bailey v. North Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. MattoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Skinner v. JerniganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Harris v. FRANK L. BLUM CONSTRUCTION COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Mason v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Register v. Administrative Office of the CourtsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Blackmon v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Lanier v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Hulcher Bros. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Blackmon v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API