Legal Opinion

Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. Mattox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 1963No. 165PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, voluntarily and without any obligation to do so, placed himself upon the hood of a truck in order to weight down its bumper so that the track might push an automobile until its motor started. He was fully aware that the hood was smooth and there was nothing on it to which he could hold. He also knew, or should have reasonably anticipated, that there might be jerks or bumps likely to cause him to lose his balance or to throw him from the truck while it was in motion. The injuries he sustained were the result of the risks to which he deliberately exposed himself. In thus placing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bogen v. . BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Jones v. SchafferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Baker v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Rimmer v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Taylor v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Hughes Ex Rel. Hughes v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Welch Ex Rel. Johnson v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Presnell v. PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Proffitt v. GosnellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API